Eyes Looking Down



Eyes Looking Down

<

Archive for the 'Google Rules' Category

fgkasdgkagkadugy

Is Google Big Brother?

Sunday, December 3rd, 2006

Posted by: Fester

Well Hello Again Everyone;

Yes, it has been nearly 9 months since I last posted. No, I am am not pregnant, but I did get f***ed back then. But I’ve let that go.

Seems there’s a lot more going on in front of our eyes that is so “in your face” we can’t see it. More on this later. Actually, not even in this post, but like, later later. Specifics first.

I’ve been very wrapped up in all sorts of educational phenomenon over the past while, and have been enlightened on many issues - which has given me a whole new perspective on things. Can’t say right now if I’ll be posting lots or none in the near future, but posting nothing doesn’t mean there’s nothing to post about. OH CONTRAYER MOAN AMEE. (yea, I know that is spelled wrong). There is an overwhelming amount of things to post about the Google camp. And it all ties in to a much larger, Orwellian prophecy of a controlled state.

Seems the mainstream is finally agreeing with me? Check out this post at over at a non ‘tinfoil hat’ link building blog. Read it. They clearly are implying their belief that Google is Big Brother, by linking to Google, using the term “Big Brother” - like this - Big Brother. See, if we all link to Google using the term “Big Brother”, whenever someone does a search for “Big Brother”, Google.com should show up as one of the top results, right under something about George Orwell or 1984, I’d hope. That would make me giggle. Like a little girl. Some poor, sleeping soul may get woken up by seeing Google at the top of their search about Big Brother…. right now it’s all TV based ‘reality’ show (yea, right) garbage. Wise old George doesn’t even show up till page two.

Oh yeah, not only do I wear a tinfoil hat, I also wear tinfoil condoms and use tinfoil arse-wipe as well. And i wrap all my food in tinfoil before I eat it. It takes the flavor away, but it’s better than swallowing a microchip (from wikipedia) that can control my mind. Think I’m a freak? Check out Project MKUltra - also from Wikipedia.

Oh, here’s an entertainingly enlightening perspective on net neutrality…. which would effectively silence me. Not like I am a booming voice, but I would just be a pebble in a mudslide of sites that you would have limited access to…

fgkasdgkagkadugy

Judge to Rule: Google MUST Be Evil
(but only In America)

Wednesday, March 15th, 2006

Posted by: Fester

Hello again, folks. Remeber me?

I’m here to kick your ass into waking up about how Google and the Gov are probably working in kahoots to follow your every move, and thought… a la George Orwell’s Big Brother style.

Well, anyway, the ‘Google is Good’ propaganda continues…

Just yesterday, the judge presiding over the Google/government case ordered Google to be evil

As mentioned at Threadwatch.org by HardBall - the government wouldn’t want something this bad unless it had real value…

A good question to ponder would be: “What’s going to happen WHEN the CHINESE government requests ALL of Google’s data - OR ELSE!?”

And as you all know my stance, it is my supposition that Google has ALREADY given the Gov everything they want, and it might even be one day revealed that Goog IS the Gov in disguise… but that’s for you conspiracy theorists to prove. I’m too busy making money off Google AdSense.

Thanks JB Jr. … uhh, I mean, Larry and Sergey.

Fester - Over and Out.

fgkasdgkagkadugy

How Google Will Take Over Your Mind

Thursday, January 26th, 2006

Posted by: Fester

I’ve been trying to say it here all along, maybe with too much emotion and not enough intelligence (I had to search Google to know how to spell ‘intelligence’), but I think the picture I’ve been trying to paint here is without a doubt best expressed by eurotrash at a recent post over at ThreadWatch (sad to se you go Nick!)…

In fact, the post by eurotrash is so good, I’m going to be a complete ass and post the whole thing here - I don’t want it to loose it’s effect. Here’s a link to the entire thread entitled Big Google Becomes Big Target
.

Here is the most incisive, succinct post EVER on what the negative potentialities of GOOGLE are…

‘My tuppence’
As I said to Matt in Vegas, what happens 20 years down the line if the United States gets a president who makes George Bush look like an utter left wing loonie and his crew get into power. The Dept of Homeland Security officer comes in with a piece of legal paper in his hand and says, “We’re taking all that data for something we are working on and this subpoena says we can!”
It worries me that although the nice left wing engineers, Mr. Brin, Mr. Page and of course the good Mr. Cutts will do everything they can to stop the officers getting the data but they won’t be able to do much.
I went through a dodgy time in a past life when an extremely dodgy, fat, stinking, lying, theiving bastard of a newspaper owner spent all his employees pension money and when the fucker disappeared off the edge of a yacht in the Atlantic so did the pensions of not only the current serving employees but also the retired employees who needed this money to live.
I was one of the lucky 12 people who were based in Amsterdam and there was a Dutch Law which said that our pension money couldn’t be put in with all the other pension money in the UK, US and Australia so my money was saved.
I think the moral of that story is that it is really up to governments to start speaking up and making better laws to start saving their citizens data and I think that it is down to governments to start asking questions about this now.
Matt, you asked what are Google doing that the others aren’t doing. First is the 2038 cookie. Why and what reason - why should you keep data on what my mother does on Google after she dies - if she doesn’t come back in a year, she probably won’t be coming?
eurotrash

Thanks eurotrash, would you like to offer some more intelligent insights here at IsGoogleEvil?com - we’d love to have you - we could use you. :)

fgkasdgkagkadugy

Proof Google is Coooooperating with ‘The Government’?

Thursday, January 26th, 2006

Posted by: Fester

Well hello again folks. I’m just getting back from picking up my nads from laughing so hard about this whole ‘Google is not cooperating with the government’ scam.

I’ve had many a critic say “Hey, where’s your proof they’re cooperating?” (BTW: I’m not saying they’re cooperating - I’m saying they probably have already given the guv EVERYTHING, before all this subpoena stuff.)

Well, OK, I can’t prove they’ve been coooperating with our government, but they do cooperate with governments, and their stance sounds very weak to me…

“While removing search results (is) inconsistent with Google’s mission… providing no information — or a heavily degraded user experience that amounts to no information — is more inconsistent with our mission.”
- Google senior policy counsel Andrew McLaughlin.

So, do you bend, or don’t you?

Here’s yer friggin proof:

From ABC News:

Saying that providing some information is better than providing no information, Google Inc. today defended its decision to cooperate with China’s demand to censor some Web search results.

The company agreed to block some sites that cover human rights, Tibet and other topics Beijing doesn’t want the citizens of this communist nation to research.

Reporters Without Borders, a media watchdog group, slammed Google — whose corporate motto is “Don’t Be Evil” — as hypocritical.

“When a search engine collaborates with the government like this, it makes it much easier for the Chinese government to control what is being said on the Internet,” said Julien Pain, head of the group’s Internet desk.

Neat, huh?

Question:
If Google is based in the USA, but the Canadian government asks for their data, do the laws up there have more weight than those down here in the good ‘ol south? - If so, and Google dumps their load, then .ca sends all the data down here cause like, we’re on high alert, eh! - and we always get what we want from them wimps.

Another question:
What if China demands all their data - and they refuse… is that the start of WWIII? (I don’t think they’re wimpy.)

Another sillier question (because I had to ask in the first place):
Is Google really above the law? Blatant copyright infringement, ignoring subpoenas, what’s next???? Imprisoning me for saying all this….???

Wooops…. maybe my next post will be from Sing-Sing… or Ling-Ling…

Fester, out.

fgkasdgkagkadugy

Read My Brain,Please !

Monday, October 17th, 2005

Regarding Google’s plan for mind control and direct to disk brain readings and thought file storage, I for one will be greatly relieved when that day comes. I will stand up and be glad to have someone else finally be responsible for the contents of my brain. Why?

Read the rest of this entry »

fgkasdgkagkadugy

Are the Google Gods Infalible?

Tuesday, September 20th, 2005

Posted by: Fester

Well, my friends and enemies…

I know what we do here is all in fun, but some of the satire is also meant to make you THINK about the darker possibilities…

This is about the upcoming ‘Partner Forum’ that Google will be holding soon - where they’ve asked 400 press and blog people to come and discuss things, but not to press and blog about it afterward. Now that we all know this is happening, is it possible that this will be possible???? Huh?

Read the rest of this entry »

fgkasdgkagkadugy

EVERYTHING’S OK! - We’re NOT Banned - Yet.

Thursday, September 8th, 2005

Posted by: Fester

Following up on yesterday’s post about being banned by Google, it seems that we were NOT banned, but I was merely the victim of my own impatience, alarmism and need to be right.

See, Google does this update/dance thingy every once-in-a-while, (read extensively about the latest update here) and it seems that just by chance that when I checked yesterday - things were amiss at Godgle, and results let me to believe that Sergey and Larry don’t like what I’m saying.

[ UPDATE 09/09/05: Seraphim Matt Cutts of Godgle says it was NOT an update - read more. ]

Read the rest of this entry »

fgkasdgkagkadugy

Google - The NEW God - Part 2

Wednesday, August 17th, 2005

Posted by: FESTER

[ link to Part 1 ]

Dammit! They did it again.

In an attempt NOT to be evil, Godgle has gone out and tried to be GOD again (or Big-Brother at least!). Yes, it seems they are totally disregarding over 100 years of copyright law - and making their own new law that suites their needs.

Here’s an excerpt from Brad Hill:

Read the rest of this entry »

fgkasdgkagkadugy

Google - The New God

Saturday, August 13th, 2005

Posted by: FESTER

With the recent banning of CNET reporters, it seems that Google is showing their ‘Big-Brotherness’ more overtly now than ever, and almost to the point of ‘Godliness’.

Yes, I’m certain you’ll soon see MAJOR press releases announcing that the most effective branding campaign ever - Google’s - is going to be nullified and overwritten by a NEW campaign… they’re changing their name to ‘Godgle’. It’s only one small letter change - but an ever more descriptive title for our omnipotent overseers.

Read the rest of this entry »

track